|
|

Sustainable Flood Management in Bangladesh
Poverty Reduction and Environmental
Management (PREM)
Flood
mitigation is clearly a very important issue for Bangladesh.
Past and current flood mitigation measures, however, have
resulted in unintended environmental impacts, including damage
to fish habitats and undesired migration. Consequent negative
impacts on poverty has been substantial in a
country such as Bangladesh, which is so dependent on fisheries.
The study intends to reveal to policymakers the nature of the complex chain that links
flood mitigation, environmental change and poverty. It
also aims to
show how economic and social welfare measures are affected when
environmental changes are taken into account in analyzing the
effect of flood mitigation policies.
Bangladesh’s
Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation (FCDI) projects are
currently under criticism for badly managing their environmental
consequences. In this study, we seek to undertake a systematic
examination of such programs that are designed to ensure social
security by reducing vulnerability of poor people. This study
will try to examine the link between the pro-poor development
policies that are related to floodplains such as projects on
water resource development (i.e., flood mitigation like
embankments, sluice gates and regulators, and other
infrastructure creation) and the livelihoods of the fishing
community living around the Meghna-Dhonagoda River basin of
Bangladesh. It will try to assess whether the current flood
mitigation projects that seek to ensure social security might
actually increase the vulnerability of poor fishing communities.
Collaborating Institution
Free
University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Research Team
Dr.
A.K. Enamul Haque
Mr. Sakib
Mahmud
Ms. Sonia
Aftab
Mr. Wahid
Abdallah
Mr. Luke
Brander
Dr. Priya
Syamsunder
Dr. Roy
Brouwer
Areas
selected for the study purpose
<updated early November 2005)
The PREM study
area is divided into three geographical locations: (1) North
Matlab, (2) South Matlab and (3) Homna. Both North Matlab and
South Matlab are situated in Chandpur district, 50 km south east
of Dhaka. Homna is situated in Comilla district (adjacent to
Chandpur district) 70 km away from Dhaka. North Matlab has an
embankment and South Matlab lies right outside the embankment.
Homna lies sixty km away from Matlab and has similar
geographical and socio-economic characteristics like Matlab.
Homna currently does not receive any protection from flooding.
A total of 1260 respondents were interviewed by local
interviewers in person during a period from the last week of
March to second week of May 2005. Households were selected using
the occupational distribution of household heads in the case
study area. Sample households were selected based on the
distribution presented in Table 1 and it followed a linear
selection method whereby households from every 5th household
clusters were matched with the occupational distribution for the
survey.
Table 1
Occupational Distribution of Sample
Household in Target Area
|
Primary Occupation |
Percent |
|
Self-employed farmer |
42.8 |
|
Self-employed fisherman |
19.0 |
|
Self-employed trader |
4.8 |
|
Transport
Worker (water) |
4.8 |
|
Transport
Worker (Land) |
9.5 |
|
Day
laborer |
19.2 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
The
interviewers were selected from the study area and thoroughly
trained. The final questionnaire was developed after several
pre-testing. The questionnaire consists of five main parts: A.
General, B. Agriculture, C. Aquaculture, D. Fishing and E.
Migration and Flood Related. The general part asks questions
that are mainly related to the respondent (age, sex, religion,
education, occupation etc.) and households’ standard of living
(income, asset ownership, food consumption, sources of water,
energy etc.). Parts B, C, and D were designed for specific
occupation group. These parts ask detailed information about
production, consumption, and sale of crops, cultivated fish and
open water fish. Part-E asks questions about migration and flood
sufferings. For households living inside the embankment this
part (part E) asks respondents questions about (their) perceived
advantages and disadvantages of flood protection embankment and
damage, if any, incurred due to water logging.
In addition to the household survey, 45 semi-structured key
informant interviews were carried out by the research team. Some
information sought from the key informants were of quantitative
nature, such as, population of the village, per capita income of
villagers, water level during flood, etc. However, most of the
information collected with key informant method was qualitative
in nature. Interviews were designed for individuals from
different professional backgrounds; and these were conducted by
local college teachers who were trained and briefed thoroughly
about the objective of interviews. Local primary school
teachers, fishing community leaders as well as field level
agricultural extension officials, health workers/NGO workers
were interviewed for the study. The Key Informant Interviews
were conducted from second week of April to second week of May
2005. On an average each interview with key informants lasted
for one and half hours. The questionnaire covered impact of
flooding on different occupational group, coping mechanisms
during and after flood, information regarding household
activities during normal and flood years etc.
Analysis Plan
Based on the
household survey data and information collected from Key
Informants, the research team is currently working on different
parts of analysis. The following six major analyses are being
carried out by different pairs of research team:
-
A.K. Enamul
Haque and Luke Brander, currently, are working on “Ex
ante and ex post cost-benefit analysis of flood protection
measures in Bangladesh”.
-
Along with
Sakib Mahmud, A.K. Enamul Haque is leading another part of the
analysis dealing with “The impact of
embankments on land use patterns.”
-
Luke Brander
and Sakib Mahmud are working on “The
impact of flood protection on housing and land prices in
Bangladesh.”
-
Roy Brouwer,
together with Sonia Aftab, have been working on “Willingness
to pay for flood protection” and on “Indicators
of Social vulnerability to flooding.”
For more
information, please mail
info@ergonline.org
|